in regards to the Guadalcanal

can either side claim moral superiority? no, starting with the japs, for one the japs decapitated soldiers leaving bloody messing all over. thats disgusting and defiantly forfeits any attempt for neutral karma. as for us soldiers, we defiantly couldn't either because we were having fun with that one jap officer by shooting at him and making him run around. it was almost torture.

the guadalcanal

I think its interesting the tactics used in the first battle we saw. its similar to WW1 in the fact that theres two sides shooting at each other. in this case the river was "no mans land" and from what i saw tradition hadn't changed, when people tried to cross to flank they were gunned down. then i saw the mortar shots. attrition anybody?

Japanese interment camps

do i think these were fair? no, i honestly don't. the reason we had these was because we suspected spies among us from japan. This is a ridiculous assumption. i think it just being racist. we can compare this to 9/11. The bombers of the world trade center just happened to be Arab so now everyone assumes every Arab is a terrorist. I don't think locking them away in the middle of nowhere was very fair. especially because maybe a handful of them were actually spies, the rest being civilians.

Rise of the Japs

I think that the reason the japs came into huge power was because of america itself. we opened up ports in japan and industrialized them, creating weapons. This will pose a very large threat because now, they went from Samaria swords to Japanese commandos. This will trigger the making of kamakazi planes which, simply put, are suicide bombers. we brought it on ourselves.